September 10, 2006

Behind the Scenes of History

There are numerous commentators, almost all of them on the internet or authors of books, who can accurately analyze and recite the endless depredations of the American industrial-political machine over the last century or so. (Examples range from the academics like Noam Chomsky, to watchdogs like Ralph Nader, to film-makers like Michael Moore.) These pundits have dissected the atrocious policies and covert activities of successive American regimes, painting a picture that is sickening but undeniable. They describe how a handful of rich, powerful, influential actors pull strings, manufacture public opinion, and exercise every manner of dirty tricks to achieve their self-serving ends. Often, they uncover or highlight links between and among these power-brokers and their accomplices in the corporate sector and the banking world.

Reading these accounts, though, the reader is allowed to retain a particular intellectual conceit of western society-- namely, that all the documented relationships among people and events are somehow the product of happenstance. In other words,

we are expected to regard history as purely, or largely, a kind of random unfolding of the universe. This view is the dominant paradigm by which history is taught, books are written, and society understands itself.
In this optic, we can discover the 'causes' of, for example, the two world wars, by examining the details of economics, international relations, national psychology, opportunistic politicians, and so on. It all has a satisfying ring of reason to it, and we all feel secure that we understand the general evolution of human society despite the chaotic mix of factors that bear on our collective behavior.

Indeed, we are culturally indoctrinated from childhood to see the world thru that optic. Our parents taught us, explicitly or implicitly, that the world is basically well-ordered, with occasional slips into chaos as one or another excuse crops up for yet another war somewhere. Societies strive mightily to maintain a sense of 'normalcy' throughout all kinds of disruptions, be they natural calamities or human conflicts. So we reach adulthood with a hard-wired program that expects a rational world wherein people behave rationally most of the time, and history is the cumulative product of stochastic processes and improvised decisions contingent on proximate circumstances. This consensus view of reality is comforting to us, and therefore any attempt to persuade the masses that there is another, very dark reality meets with classic denial tactics-- anger, ridicule, appeals to 'reason,' and so on.

As with all paradigms that are subsumed into the realm of unconscious knowledge, it doesn't occur to people that this IS a paradigm-- ie. a filter on our perceptions. And like any perceptual filter, it is by no means guaranteed to provide an accurate description of reality. What the above-described paradigm (the stochastic view of history, to give it a brief label) does is to disempower us, for two reasons. First, any viewpoint that is unconscious, and thus that we are unaware of, can and will supply distortions of reality that are not only inconvenient but potentially hazardous. Second, it is indicative of an underlying, inherent weakness of the 'Western cultural view' that desires to 'analyze' everything-- that is, to disintegrate every phenomenon into a set of increasingly minute components... and to assume that thereby we understand it. This is the reductio ad absurdum trap, for in decomposing the phenomenon, we in fact lose sight of the whole. Almost every aspect of society suffers as a result of this inherent, yet unchallenged insistence on decomposing things. For example, the medical system is a notable offender. You are prescribed a drug to control a certain abnormal condition... but that drug creates other undesirable effects that must then be treated in the same, disconnected manner.

Ironically, our technologists have invented a recent technique called 'pattern recognition' which is essentially the application of so-called 'artificial intelligence' software to discern coherent patterns in supplied data. The data could be handwritten text, for example, and the system attempts to decode it, that is, to convert it into ASCII characters. The same techniques can be used to sift through huge databases of information on, say, credit card customers, to determine their spending habits (on a demographic basis, ostensibly). Humans are actually rather good at pattern recognition... provided they have not been trained to suppress this faculty and replace it with 'group think.' Unfortunately, it has been a hallmark of Western society for centuries that analysis is preferred to synthesis, and our school system does nothing to attempt to free students from this mental straightjacket.

All of this being a prelude to my modest proposal-- that history, certainly the history of the last few centuries, is not stumbling along haphazardly, but is really being purposefully propelled. That's right; if you take an overview of the patterns presented by all those analytic commentators-- connect the dots, in the current argot-- you start to discern some amazing pictures. Sure, you may claim; that's exactly what many skeptics are doing with the story of '9-11', 2001... they are digging and finding the connections that all point to a conspiracy by the highest gov't authorities to create a domestic crisis for their own ends. True; but I'm saying you have to pull the telescope back even further and look for the pattern behind the story we call 911. Unless we get to the root of the evils in our midst, they will, like noxious weeds, continually regenerate to choke out any hope of building a society of justice and true democracy.

For those who refuse to simply buy into the acceptable, common understanding of events, there is a structure, a direction to the events that shape our lives on a collective basis. And if a direction, then there are directors. So, while Chomsky can catalog the egregious sins of several generations of US gov't administrations, even he seems to treat each case as the sad result of individual human foibles and avarice. What I am stating unequivocally is that the catalog of 'errors in judgment' represents the deliberate efforts of a secret cabal whose ultimate goal is nothing less than world domination. This shadowy group has been diligently directing political and economic decisions in mainly the 'industrialized world' for at least a couple of centuries. They thrive on chaos, having learned early on how to reap huge fortunes by playing both sides in every conflict they foment. So behind the apparent chaos exists a conscious order secretly imposed by a largely unknown band of manipulators.

In this essay, I don't want to attempt to distill the vast amounts of information available on the 'ultimate conspiracy' that now threatens mankind as never before. It's vital to make a point, though: it's far too easy to dismiss all such talk about an ultimate conspiracy as 'wild-eyed conspiracy theories.' Of course. That's precisely what they want us to believe! 'That's what conspiracy theorists always say,' retort those determined to remain in denial. It's a stand-off that has allowed the cabal to carry on their grisly, self-serving plans with impunity for all these years. The great majority of decent, peaceful citizens can never imagine the existence of a small group dedicated to controlling the world-- and therefore, they make the workings of those conspirators all the more easy. And it is a matter of imagination, for the system of education, both formal and implicit, basically homogenizes the thinking of the masses, and blunts our ability to imagine things outside the boxes of group-think. By implicit education I refer to the constant conditioning of our impressions that is an on-going process of indoctrination conducted by the mass media and entertainment industries. These outlets will actually portray conspiracies of the insidious kind I'm talking about; but they do so precisely because they can create the impression that such ideas are purely fictional. Hence, when anyone attempts to wake the populace from their slumber, the 'powers that be' start the ridicule with taunts of 'conspiracy theory,' as if all such notions are ridiculous. But consider the words of some commentators:

'Indisputably, all of these minor factoids involving world-shattering events are singularly insignificant; but when taken together, and contrasted to the increasingly provable prima facie evidence of a Bush regime inside job on September 11, 2001, an unmistakable pattern of a "War OF Terror" is surfacing to justify the continued wars of imperial conquest in the Middle East and the suspension of human rights here in America to usher in the New World Order via Bush's launching of the North American Union.'

Theodore Lang, 6/06.

"Contrary to widespread childish opinion, most of the important things that happen in the world, happen because powerful forces intend them to happen, not because of some so-called "sociological" or other statistical coincidence of the types reported for the popular edification of the easily deluded."

Sometime presidential 'hopeful'
Lyndon Larouche

Now to those who simply cannot bring themselves to seriously consider the prospect of a grand conspiracy, perhaps an alternative avenue is to present a set of questions that beg rational responses... responses that are sorely lacking. For example...

  • Why is Bush (ostensibly a 'conservative') deliberately driving the USA into an enormous debt crisis with his costly wars, tax cuts for the rich, and madcap spending? (The US dollar has already slid in value compared to other currencies.)
  • Why is Bush completely careless with regard to the Kyoto Accord and environmental protection? (Could he know that it's a futile exercise in any case?)
  • Why do the media give the Bush regime a free pass on virtually all the hard issues that would have torpedoed presidents in the past?
  • Why do government agencies (FBI, NSA, notably) refuse to release videotapes confiscated at the scene of the 911 attack on the Pentagon?
  • Why was there no SEC investigation into the obvious signs of insider trading of airline stocks prior to 911?
  • Why has there been no inquiry into explaining why four hijacked airliners could fly unchallenged for an hour and a half altogether in the busiest corridor in the Americas? (Like, where was the air force? Was NORAD on vacation?)
  • Why did it take the mighty US gov't many days to mount a rescue operation for New Orleans... when they had days of warning before the hurricane?
  • Why did Bush invade Iraq, really? And why is he so bent on invading Iran?

These are just a few of numerous questions that only get asked in the 'alternative media' mainly on the worldwide web. The mainstream media simply ignore the monsters staring us all in the face, as if hoping that that proves they don't exist. None of these questions has been given a rational answer by the White House authorities. Yet they all point to one underlying, unavoidable conclusion: there is a conspiracy that orchestrated the 911 events, and that has co-opted the complicity of the media in ignoring all evidence that would reveal the truth. As stated above, the 911 'false-flag' attacks, horrific in themselves, are merely the most obvious symptom of the disease of world domination politics. These viruses have been present in the body politic of the world for centuries, but finally, in the 21st century, they are 'presenting' (to use the medical analogy) in very overt, spectacular, and horrific ways. The top echelon of the conspiracy see that most of the pieces are now in place for the final realization of their ages-old dream. They have a virtual stranglehold on the most powerful nation on earth; and they can use it to leverage the co-operation, willing or otherwise, of every other nation on the planet.

In fact, the conspirators are getting so arrogantly sure of their hubris that they are blatantly leaving their 'trademarks' on all their dirty deeds, secure in the self-assurance that the masses are so mesmerized by the reality they have created that the conspiracy will never be unmasked... until it's a 'done deal.' Those trademarks are the occult, generally numerological symbols that are an inherent part of their evil culture. The kind of 'fingerprints' you will find, without need of magnifying glass, are generally coded in the dates of significant events. The notable example is '9-11' where 9+1+1=11 which is one of the favored satanic numbers. You have also the Madrid train bombings of '3-11' (2004), the London bombings of '7-7' (2005), and the Mumbai bombings of '7-11' (2006)... (3 and 7 are other favorite occult numbers). There are many other demonic practices and symbols that characterize the Illuminati sphere (e.g. see 'Skull and Bones Society' of Yale U.; Bohemian Grove; etc.) but I won't elaborate on them here.

These symbols are purely satanic, since (brace yourself) the secret society are sold out to their ultimate master and guru, Satan. Whether you believe in the Devil or not is immaterial to the substance of this essay; and immaterial to the plans of the conspirators. They would prefer that you continue to deny his existence, since it just makes things easier for them. The bottom line is that they are motivated by a self-serving, malicious spirit bent on exalting a select few over the many.

Some firm atheists may agree with much of my thesis... but simply can't go along with this 'Devil business.' Fine; don't get hung up on it. But, surely anyone of any creed can admit that mankind has, especially in recent years, taken some transparently idiotic, self-destructive directions. For illustration, we could cite US policies to protect big business at the expense of the environment, or at obvious peril to longer-term stability; unabated resource consumption in the face of ecological damage; continued reliance on hydrocarbon fuels in the knowledge of global warming; pollution of the land, sea, and air when we know the health damage; promotion of genetically modified crops when they offer no advantages and pose unknown risks; and you can think of others. When we are intelligent enough to create destructive technologies, and to then recognize their destructiveness... yet continue to create and employ them-- is that not a symptom of collective insanity? What do you suppose drives such patent idiocy? If you speak to any given individual, they would most likely grasp the futility of our actions, and propose saner actions. Yet we are led by 'elected' individuals who embark on self-destructive policies! Why? Well, I've just argued that it's because of the shadow governors behind the scenes. But what impels these manipulative geniuses towards apparent world catastrophe? What has been protecting their identities and schemes all these years? What gives them cohesion when their evil puppets self-destruct with regularity? It can only be a 'higher' force, which you may ascribe to group psychopathy, alien orchestration, or demonic influence. I think in view of the clear occult manifestations of this crew, there is only one sensible conclusion.

The reason it's important to squarely face up to the existence of the secret conspiracy is because none of the cogent, insightful analyses of evil events in the world will amount to anything, accomplish any meaningful or lasting benefits, as long as the true, underlying instigators remain undetected. The cogent commentators can continue to reveal piecemeal instances of collusion, but unless and until they put together those separate pieces into a coherent picture, it accomplishes very little. As with western physicians vainly pursuing the treatment of isolated symptoms, the disease just keeps manifesting in a new manner, often more maliciously. Well-meaning crusaders can tilt at specific windmills of evil; onlookers may wring their hands in dismay; but the Hydra just grows more horrible heads when individual appearances are neutralized. The only way this growing serpent of chaos could be extinguished is by, first, uncovering it from under the darkness in which it hides, unmasking the secret conspirators; and second, confiscating their every resource of vast wealth and influence. Most unfortunately, this is not going to happen-- destiny must be fulfilled. This world-- far from basically benign and stable-- is a cosmic madhouse, run by men of dead conscience bent on an insane dream to 'become as gods'... in a world reduced to rubble by their self-destructive sorcery.

No comments:

Post a Comment