May 7, 2013

False Flags Unveiled

With the Boston Marathon bombing still fresh in the public consciousness, and before that, the Sandy Hook shooting, the 'alternative press' is awash with references to 'false-flag' terrorism. A recent article on a blog [1] defined what constitutes a 'false flag attack,' and how it differs from a 'psy-op,' and how the two work together to condition the public. While it provides useful insight, I realized that...
what is also needed is a guide for people to be able to discern when an 'event' is a genuine 'terrorist attack' or another false-flag, staged event. Toward that objective, let's consider the distinguishing marks of a typical false-flag incident-- ten indicators that will tell you when an 'official explanation' doesn't pass the 'smell test.'

1. 'Drill for the drill' – one feature of false-flag attacks that comes up, time after time, is the occurrence of a 'practice exercise' by the police, or military, or security forces, on the very day, time and place of the purported incident.
You can go back to the ultimate false-flag of the 21st century, the attacks on NYC and DC on 9-11-01, and everyone knows that the CIA was having a 'drill' that day that just so happened to center around the scenario of high-jacked airliners being used to crash into buildings...while NORAD was also having a training exercise involving airborne attacks. How about that for all you 'coincidence theorists?'
Again, in London, on 7-7-05, security forces just happened to be conducting an exercise that envisioned a bombing in the underground and on the bus system. Gee-- how close to 'reality' could they have guessed?
Similarly, some kind of drill was conducted during the Boston Marathon bombing, as verified by eye-witness accounts. In this case, the authorities have denied that an exercise was under way, despite the evidence.
The idea behind these 'exercises' is that they provide convenient cover for (1) the presence of various government agents/troops/etc., (2) the excuse of confusion when people question why all the security measures failed, (3) a pretext for framing suitable 'patsies.' Many netizens have caught on to this ruse, and are spreading the word before the next staged drama.

2. Consider the date – Yes, the numbers that make up the date of the incident. Note that so many past incidents occurred on dates with curious number sequences-- e.g. 9-11 (9+1+1=11), 7-7-2005 (2+5=7), 3-11-04 (Madrid train bombs), 3-13-03 (Mumbai train bombings), 26-11-08 (Mumbai terrorist attacks), and so on it goes.
To a newcomer to the world of government terror, this will sound too esoteric to be real. But, put aside the doubts long enough to investigate, and you come to see the weird patterns. The fact is that the people who orchestrate these attacks are deeply connected with the occult or demonic realm. They really believe that certain numbers enhance the power of their 'majick tricks.' (If you don't believe me, just 'dial 911.')
You have to know that 7 and 11 are favorite occult numbers, but 8, 9 and 13 are also evident, depending on other 'mystical clues.' It's bizarre... but it applies.

3. The 'black-ops' connections – A common feature of many of the terrorist attacks-- whether failed or successful-- is the connection with government undercover operatives.
In very many cases, the fingered suspect(s) is/are revealed as being handled by the FBI, or the CIA, or MI5, the RCMP, or whatever. The story goes that these organizations were 'keeping a watchful eye' on these 'subversives.' If you really pay attention, you'll see that really, the gov't handlers were luring gullible young idealists into planning potential crimes, and often setting them up to be caught, either before or after carrying out the supplied plan. If 'before,' then the agency claims a successful interception of terrorist acts; if 'after,' they lament that their patsy was somehow able to elude them.
The Tsarnaev brothers are classic (and tragic) examples. Except in their case, there is reason to suspect that the CIA was using them to infiltrate overseas organizations, and then double-crossed the pair to take the rap for the Boston bombs.

4. Pay attention to on-site reports – As underscored in the above-cited article, the media are full, essential partners in pulling off a false-flag event, so don't expect to hear the truth from them... except by accident.
Often, the earliest reports from the scene will include correct details that are damning to the official story-line. These inadvertent 'slips' are invariably quickly removed and disappear down the proverbial black hole, never to be reported again. This happens in most FF operations because they are too complex to have every possible detail covered by the conspirators. If you noted a particular detail-- especially one that strikes a strange note-- and it later is never mentioned again, that's a clue to a 'FF op.'
Thanks to the Internet-- and alert netizens-- most of these slips are captured by someone and are available if you search for them. Good example: early on 9-11, a network reporter covering the scene from a helicopter noticed the explosion that rocked the second tower, but he made no mention whatever of an airliner! 'Bet you never heard that one, except maybe on Youtube.

5. Keep track of the story-line – As FF ops unfold, the official narrative will change and twist in a myriad of directions; contradictions will abound, even on the network propaganda organs.
At the Sandy Hook 'shootings,' the police were saying that the children were killed by hand-gun fire, while the coroner, in a rambling interview, stated that a long-gun was used. At the Boston Marathon event, spectators' videos showed numerous security agents behaving oddly, while network video was all about the supposed terrorists. The police claimed Tamerlan was run over by his brother's SUV, while on-lookers stated it was the cops' vehicle.
The inconsistencies are rampant in these events, and it takes days, sometimes weeks, for the media to get the official story-line 'correct' (i.e. 'straight'). And, yes, it's not unusual for there to be confusion during a 'terrorist' attack; however, the blatant contradictions that distinguish a FF op go beyond the expected norm. These are details that ought to be known right away, and should not confound common knowledge, or common sense. The FBI should know whether the Tsarnaev brothers were on their payroll (which they were) or not-- the story should not change from one day to the next!

6. Does the official 'explanation' make sense? - Now, there's a good criterion. Consider the famous, Christmas, underwear bomber incident that resulted in every air traveller now having his/her privates inspected by 'security officers.' An African from Nigeria (near the equator) travelling from Holland to Detroit-- both cities in the cold northern hemisphere in December-- and he's not wearing anything more than summer attire, carries no baggage, and has no passport or boarding pass... yet he gets on the plane with a bomb in his gotch. Come on, people-- this story is prima-facie ludicrous! It would never have fooled a 9-year old, but for the disgraceful compliance of the mass media.

7. Who gets blamed? - The whole idea of a FF op is to pin the blame on the 'donkey du jour,' the latest bogeyman that the government(s) have in their sights.
On 9-11-01, the towers had hardly collapsed when the media announced that it was done by Osama bin Laden, the scape-goat of choice. Why bin Laden? Just see what horrible sequence of events went into motion following 9-11. The invasion of Iraq, the invasion of Afghanistan, and the dozen years of bloodshed that have occurred since then. The Washington cabal needed a figurehead by whom to justify their incursions into the Middle East region, so an Arab/Muslim was just the pretext needed.
Now that the US gov is preparing for social collapse inside the realm, they need 'domestic terrorists' they can direct their dictatorial attention towards; hence, 'lone gunmen' incidents, and now, the Boston bombings.

8. Watch what is proposed next – As implied in point 7, the naming of 'suspects' will provide an indication of how the current agenda of the government can be advanced by exploiting the 'cowardly attack.'
In 2001, the PNAC group was itching for a pretext to invade the Middle East region, and to supply a new enemy for the military-industrial axis. That project continues today, with 'humanitarian concern' (oh, sure) for Syria's civilian population.
The current desire of the US gov to disarm Americans of military-grade weapons means that the threat of domestic terror must be vivid enough for the populace to go along with this scheme. Expect more such incidents across the country (and look up 'Operation Gladio' on the web for some illuminating reading).
September 11/01 was the majick show used by the PTB to begin in earnest the removal of human rights, as well as incessant wars. The ludicrous 'crotch bomber' incident was leveraged to get the federal gov to purchase 'naked, X-ray scanners' for all the major airports (from a company partly owned by Michael Chertoff, then head of DHS). Sandy Hook was used to initiate the first legislation against the 2nd Amendment right to bear arms. And on it goes.
So, listen for the ready-made memes, usually packaged in convenient words and phrases that can be repeated ad-nauseum by the media whores. You've heard them before: 'terrorists,' 'cowardly,' 'extremists,' 'al Qaeda,' Muslims, etc. etc.

9. Look for the white-wash 'investigation' – This is a major give-away that an event was staged. We've seen this sorry movie too many times already.
Perhaps the first outrageous, official white-wash was the Warren Commission investigation of the JFK assassination. Oliver Stone's movie demonstrated many of the plain crazy assertions of the official explanation, and to this day, a large portion of the populace knows that something evil happened that November day in Dallas. But since the media pretend it all makes sense, more or less, then most people shrug and forget it.
Similarly, the 'crime of the (21st) century' that occurred on 9-11-01 was given a very sorry spectacle for an official investigation. So much so, that the chief investigators themselves later admitted that their report was flawed. (They basically stated that the military lied to them).
The hallmark of these 'investigations' is that they are obviously hiding facts that 'they' (governments, generally) don't want known by the public. They need to obscure the truth because they don't want the guilty persons and agencies identified as 'insiders.'
Phoney investigations are easier to discern than the events they examine, generally. Therefore, these white-washes are a clear sign that the incident was a false-flag op.

10. Shoddy journalism rules the day – it's a given, sadly, that investigative journalism is long dead in the mainstream media. What we have now is manufactured news and disguised propaganda.
That said, during and after a FF op, the journalistic laxity will be especially egregious. The inevitable interviewed experts will all be singing from the same song-sheet. The same 'approved' videos will appear on all the major network news. The same inadvertent truths will disappear almost simultaneously from all stations. And of course, the same key-word phrases (as noted above) will be repeated like mantras on all the news-casts. None of the key, relevant questions will be addressed by any so-called journalist.

There are other, more subtle signals that an experienced observer can use to detect a false-flag operation; but for most of us, these ten indicators will provide sufficient light on a given event to make us fairly certain it was staged. You may not find all ten 'finger-prints' every time.
But if several are apparent, then surely that's enough evidence to make you doubt the official story, and do some personal searching of the 'underground press.'

See also:

(c) W. Kazimir, Apr. 2013

May 4, 2013

The Harlot of Revelation

Chapter 17 of the book of Revelation presents the vision of a harlot riding a beast. This study takes a verse-by-verse look, with my notes on what (I believe) the text is saying. 
The reader should bear in mind, thru-out, that the entire book of Revelation is written as allegory.

[1] Then one of the seven angels who had the seven bowls came and spoke with me, saying, “Come here, I will show you the judgement of the great harlot who sits on many waters, [...]
Note: This vision is devoted to describing the harlot (prostitute) and the beast, and their fate that occurs at the 'end of the Age. The angel addresses the 'many waters' later in the text.

John, the writer, continues his description of the vision...
[2] with whom the kings of the earth committed acts of immorality, and those who dwell on the earth were made drunk with the wine of her immorality.
Note: the immoral activity of this 'system' (the harlot) has made many people intoxicated, and involves the participation of the 'kings' (political heads) of the earth. They are 'drunk' on wealth, on political power, on indulging their lusts of every kind.

[3] And he carried me away in the Spirit into a wilderness; and I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet beast, full of blasphemous names, having seven heads and ten horns.
Notes: beasts, in prophecy, are symbolic of kingdoms (or nations, as we now say); blasphemous names indicate a wicked nature, contrary to God. The mention of 7 heads/10 horns creates a link with the book of Daniel's prophetic visions, and with those of ch. 13.

[4] The woman was clothed in purple and scarlet, and adorned with gold and precious stones and pearls, having in her hand a gold cup full of abominations and of the unclean things of her immorality,
Notes: the rich adornments, gold and precious stones all denote great wealth; the cup of filthiness indicates that this wealth was not obtained ethically, and that the system is corrupt to the core.

[5] and on her forehead a name was written, a mystery, “BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND OF THE ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.”
Notes: Babylon harkens to the ancient seat of occult knowledge. As 'mother of harlots,' this system has spawned numerous detestable spin-offs, that are abominable in God's eyes.

[6] And I saw the woman drunk with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the witnesses of Jesus. When I saw her, I wondered greatly.
Notes: this system has martyred many believers in God and Christ, over the ages. Knowing that OT scripture often used a woman to represent 'Israel', many exegetes have extrapolated the image to conclude that the harlot must represent the Roman Church (the Vatican) which notoriously persecuted true believers (called 'heretics') over the Dark Ages.

The angel tells John he will explain the vision for him.
[7] And the angel said to me, “Why do you wonder? I will tell you the mystery of the woman and of the beast that carries her, which has the seven heads and the ten horns.
Note: The verses to follow are crucial (and paramount) in understanding the prophecy.

First, the angel/interpreter starts with the beast.
[8] “The beast that you saw was, and is not, and is about to come up out of the abyss and [will] go to destruction. And those who dwell on the earth, whose name has not been written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, will wonder when they see the beast, that he was and is not and will come. [My italics].
Notes: From Daniel (the OT 'apocalypse') and the following verses, we infer that the beast is a composite of 'kingdoms' or, as we say today, nations. Note the stress on the fact that this beast 'was'-- i.e. existed before this revelation; it 'is not,' -- didn't exist at the time of writing; and it 'will come (again)'-- will appear 'out of the abyss' at some future date.
NB: in studying chapter 13, we found the similar beast, one of whose heads received a deadly wound yet survived, to the wonder of the world. Using the clues from ch. 13 with help from this ch. 17, we clearly observed that the (1st) beast is the modern state of Israel.

The angel then expounds on the 7 heads.
[9] Here is the mind which has wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains on which the woman sits, [10] and they are seven kings; five have fallen, one is, the other has not yet come; and when he comes, he must remain a little while. [11] The beast which was and is not, is himself also an eighth and is one of the seven, and he goes to destruction.
Notes: most expositors see the 7 mountains and promptly conclude that, sure enough, this is Rome (city of 7 hills). However, the angel continues with the convoluted clue about the 7 kings (kingdoms). Remember that there were 7 dominant kingdoms in John's era and region-- Assyria, Babylon, Egypt, Greece, Israel, Persia, Rome. Of these, all except Greece had 'fallen' to become (five) Roman provinces. The 'one' is Rome. The 'eighth' which is also one of the seven, again, is Israel. It was one of the original seven, and in 'resurrected' format returns as the eighth kingdom of the vision.
Note, especially, that the 'Roman Church' did NOT exist before John, thus cannot be the beast that 'was and is not' at the time he wrote the revelation.
Next, he considers the 10 horns.
[12] The ten horns which you saw are ten kings who have not yet received a kingdom, but they receive authority as kings with the beast for one hour. [13] These have one purpose, and they give their power and authority to the beast. [14] These will wage war against the Lamb, and the Lamb will overcome them, because He is Lord of lords and King of kings, and those who are with Him are the called and chosen and faithful.
Notes: From Daniel 2, which sketches the most straightforward picture of the future, it's reasonable to conclude that the 'ten kings' represent the present European Union. Altho some analysts abandoned this idea when the EU grew beyond ten members, the fact is that ten is a symbolic number for a designated set-- here, the revived 'Holy Roman Empire.' Mainly thru Germany, the EU has lent its support to Israel (the beast). In so doing, the EU has declared war on Christ.

Concluding, the angel relates the coming fate of the characters depicted.
[15] And he said to me, “The waters which you saw where the harlot sits, are peoples and multitudes and nations and tongues. [16] And the ten horns which you saw, and the beast, these will hate the harlot and will make her desolate and naked, and will eat her flesh and will burn her up with fire. [17] For God has put it in their hearts to execute His purpose by having a common purpose, and by giving their kingdom to the beast, until the words of God will be fulfilled.
Notes: the angel indicates that the harlot is located in a region with a great population, with numerous 'nations' and languages. This scenario could point to either Europe, as some expositors favor, or the Middle East, as others claim. However, one might argue that if the word 'nations' is used in the sense of ethnic groups, then it could possibly refer to the 'New World' (i.e. USA), the melting pot of cultural and linguistic groups.
Ultimately, the angel/guide confirms, the nations that were 'ridden' (covertly ruled) by the harlot will throw her off, and destroy her. This turning will evidently be a nasty, horrific event.

Finally, the guide makes a defining statement regarding the identity of the woman.
[18] The woman whom you saw is the great city, which reigns over the kings of the earth.
Notes: Now this is a tantalizing clue! After all the other hints, the angel ends by saying the harlot is a city that reigns over the kingdoms of the earth. On the surface, even mindful that this is an entirely symbolic depiction, several possible candidates come to mind.

So, what city reigns over the earth at this time? Protestant pundits have insisted it's the Vatican; others claim it's Rome (as of a revived Holy Roman Empire); still others say it's Brussels, as seat of the EU (and having '7 hills,' incidentally). There are unavoidable problems with any of these choices, and with most other proposed candidates.

Altho John refers to a 'city,' we have to remember that the whole text is figurative. Thus, the city could (probably does) represent a system of belief or practices united under one rubric. If we piece all the clues in this chapter together, I suggest that the most likely nominee is London, or more precisely, the City of London, England. This 'city' represents the center of a system, that system being none other than the 'fiat money' banking syndicate that underpins-- and thereby rules-- all the nations of the world!

Those who've studied the socio-economic-political state of the world, comprehend how the international bankers, leveraging their enormous monetary power, actually exercise dominion over all the nations. (In fact, only 3 countries do not have a central bank owned/controlled by the Rothschild banking complex-- and they are all under attack at this moment.) The capitol of this global empire, ruled by fiscal might, is a small, independent, financial enclave called 'the City of London' in the heart of the metropolis.

London is a highly cosmopolitan city, with teeming millions of people from all parts of the world, speaking numerous languages.

Notice that the whore is fabulously wealthy; this certainly accords with the banking elite. Also, she is identified with 'Mystery Babylon,' which clue eludes most exegetes because they aren't familiar with the traits of the secret ruling elite. Those relatively few individuals who occupy the hidden seats of true authority are allied with luciferian forces that give them the uncanny ability to dominate the seven continents ('mountains').

Moreover, I contend that this banking empire has used its almost limitless wealth to spawn related organizations and/or systems. Delving into 'black history,' one finds that the bankers instigated soviet Communism in the early 20th century. They also funded fascism in Europe to trigger World War II. The international bankers fund/attend all manner of 'abominations' around the world, including bizarre, occult conventions like 'the Bohemian Grove' in California. They utilize both Freemasonry and the Vatican, and are the financial bulwark of militant Zionism. Their cult can honestly be said to be 'the Mother of Harlots.'

Is the global banking establishment responsible for shedding the blood of 'saints' (believers in Christ)? On the surface, no. Below the surface, undoubtedly. For instance, their Communist revolution in Russia caused the death of some 20 million souls, many of them Christians. In fact, the last scenes have yet to unfold; as the last tribulation engulfs the world, we can expect much blood to be shed by believers at the hands of this godless, antichrist 'harlot.'

Multiple Babylons!

The only 'problem' with my interpretation of Babylon in chapter 17, is that it does not accord with my own understanding of Babylon in chapter 18! However, I think there is a reasonable solution to this dilemma.

In our dreams it is common for objects and situations to morph from one form to another, perhaps several times. This would make no sense in the waking world, but is normal in the dream world. In like manner, I believe that concepts used in apocalyptic prophecy can 'morph' in their figurative meaning. In particular, Babylon appears in several significant scenes in John's revelation. I contend that Babylon has different roles in each appearance. Even in the epistles, Peter refers to Babylon; but that entity had already ceased to be a player on the political stage. Scholars concur that he was referring obliquely to Rome.

After the exile of Jews in Babylon, the name of that city-state signified religious oppression and abhorrent pagan practices (for instance, child sacrifices to Molech and other gods). Since Babylon was also home to astrologers, necromancers, sorcerers, magicians, and 'Chaldeans' (see Daniel 2) its name became synonymous with the occult, which is to say demonic realm.

Alexander Hislop wrote a famous book entitled The Two Babylons, which reveals the Vatican (Roman Catholicism) as a revival of ancient, pagan Babylon. The key point is that Babylon is emblematic of all that is opposed to true Godly worship.

Thus, references to Babylon in John's Revelation are intended to link back to the book of Daniel-- written in Babylon-- which is replete with dream-vision imagery, and importantly, explanations by 'angels' of these images-- the same images employed by John.

The picture of 'Babylon' was introduced in chapter 14 in an enigmatic proclamation:
[8] And another angel, a second one, followed, saying, “Fallen, fallen is Babylon the great, she who has made all the nations drink of the wine of the passion [wrath] of her immorality.”
It seems to be a brief foreshadow of the major elaboration in chapter 18, which we'll touch on, below.

Chapter 17 reveals the drunken harlot on whose forehead was written the 'mystery' title of 'Babylon the Great, Mother of Harlots and of Abominations of the Earth.' In fact, because there was no punctuation in the original manuscripts, one could reasonably state the title as 'Mystery Babylon the Great, etc.' especially given what we've noted about Babylon's occultism. Piecing together all the clues, I have made a case that the harlot is the City of London; or more accurately, the global financial dictatorship directed from that city.

Then Babylon re-appears in chapter 18; which begs the question, 'Is this the same entity as just dealt with in chapter 17?' And my answer is 'no!' Here's why. Notice that chapter 17 presents a complete scenario in itself. It opens with the angel telling John he will show him the judgement (fate) of the prostitute, and ends with the description of how the beast turns on the woman and destroys her. (And note that the text was divided into chapters and verses only much later than the original writing.)

The next verse-- which demarcates the start of chapter 18-- begins with the words 'After these things I saw another angel coming down from heaven' (my italics). Clearly, the vision has shifted to a different scenario. This new angel cries out 'Fallen, fallen is Babylon the great!' And I'm saying that this time, Babylon refers to a different entity than in chapter 17. The same occult connotations are meant to be conjured up by the name Babylon, but this time they apply to another entity.

Since this essay is intended to reveal the great harlot of chapter 17, I will not elaborate on the text of chapter 18. I have analyzed chapter 18 in another essay, and direct the interested reader to study it there...

(c) J. Krzyzewski, May, 2013